AMAZON GREAT IINDIAN FESTIVAL OFFERS

Friday 21 December 2018

Structural Mechanics

Computer Analysis of Pin-Jointed Frames

Degree of Static Indeterminacy (Ds)
In statics, a structure is said to be statically indeterminate when the available equilibrium equations are insufficient to determine unknown forces. Thus additional equations are written in terms of compatibility to evaluate unknown forces. The number of such additional equations defines the degree of Static Indeterminacy 


Degree of Kinematic Indeterminacy (Dk)
In Kinematics, a structure is said to be statically indeterminate when the available compatibility equations are insufficient to determine unknown displacements. Thus additional equations are written in terms of equilibrium to evaluate unknown displacements. The number of such additional equations defines the degree of kinematic Indeterminacy 

For analysis of a pin-jointed frames/trusses both flexibility and stiffness methods are employed to write a computer programs. In Practice stiffness method is preferable to the flexibility method due to;
  1. The assumption of restrained structure (lock joints) is a simple approach compare to redundant forces (released structure) in flexibility approach, which has limitation in case of a complex and large structure.
  2. A Displacement given at any one joint deforms only those members which are connected directly to the joint.
  3. The development of the stiffness matrix involves lesser computations
The Direct stiffness method approach is used in analysis of trusses and frames. In this method stiffness matrix for a single member with respect to system coordinate is obtained first, from the stiffness matrix with respect to element coordinates by means of transformation matrices , the stiffness matrices for all members are then synthesized to obtain the stiffness matrix for the entire structure.
      In order to facilitate computer application and to obtain a standard form for transformation matrix two element coordinates are assigned to the member instead of one. 1* and 2* are the element coordinates  and 1 to 4 are system coordinates located at the near end A and far end B of member AB of a plane truss/frame as shown in figure 1 (a).
       

                  Figure 1(a)                                            Figure 1(b)
similarly 1* and 2* are the element coordinates and 1 to 6 are the system coordinates for a member of a space truss/frame as shown in figure 1 (b)
    In this method for writing the computer program, the coordinates are assigned to all unrestrained as well as restrained displacement components, thus ensuring that there are two coordinates in the direction of X and Y axes at both ends of member in plane truss/frame. Similarly there are coordinates in the direction X, Y and Z axes at each end of member in space truss/frame. Thus total number of system coordinates are;
Plane truss/ frame ---- 2j
Space truss/frame ---- 3j
where j is number of joints
     The numbering of coordinates are done starting from unconstrained displacement components first, followed by the constrained displacement components, to facilitate the partitioning of the matrices in force-displacement relationship. The matrix proportioning gives two matrix equations one of them gives the unconstrained displacement, while other gives the support reactions.  
for example:


               The degree of freedom = Number of unconstrained displacement component (13) 
               Number of constrained displacement  = 3 (14, 15, 16)

N-12: Determine the resultant of the following force system shown in figure

Design of shallow foundations


Thursday 25 October 2018

Performance-based Seismic Design of RC Structures

आरसी संरचनाओं का प्रदर्शन-आधारित भूकंपीय डिजाइन

Overview

The occurrence of recent earthquakes in countries across the world raises the need for a fundamental change in the present seismic design procedure appearing in Indian Seismic Codes. Present seismic design codes are force-based, that is, forces and displacements within elastic limits are calculated, and their combination is used to design the structural and non-structural components. Serviceability checks are applied using displacement limits and ductile detailing. Inelastic responses are calculated by applying the response reduction factor, which relates to force or displacement amplification; however, such an indirect approach causes misjudgement in the actual building response [Zameeruddin and Sangle, 2016].  

 Figure 1: Past earthquakes tremors across the world

With an aim to communicate the safety-related decisions, the design practice focuses on the predictive method of assessing potential seismic performance, known as performance-based seismic design (PBSD). 

           PBSD is a generalized design philosophy in which design criteria are expressed in terms of achieving stated performance objectives when the structure is subjected to the stated levels of seismic hazard [Ahemad Ghobarah,2001]. PBSD permits the design and construction of buildings with a realistic and reliable understanding of the risk to life, occupancy, and economic loss that may occur because of future seismic events [Ronald Hamburger, 2006]. PBSD is an iterative process, which begins with the selection of performance objectives (that are defined by the owners, designers, and building officials), followed by the development of a preliminary design (considering stated set of performance objectives), an assessment of whether the design meets the performance objectives, and finally redesign and reassessment, if required, until the desired performance level is achieved [ATC 58, 2013]. Fig. 1 displays the flowchart representing key steps in the PBSD procedure.

Fig. 1. PBSD flow diagram [FEMA 445, 2006]

State-of-art-of-development

Performance-based methods have the potential to significantly magnify many aspects of building design, including seismic protection. This potential was used in practice and further modification was done to get it integrated with the present building codes. As it addresses the seismic design this approach has been termed as “Performance -based Seismic Design” [Freeman, 2000].

      PBSD has been in practice since late 1900’s. This appeared firstly in the documentation published by the Structural Engineering Association of California (SEAOC, 1960) and Portland Cement Association (PCA). The SEAOC publication introduced a lateral force equation which accounts seismic hazard (Z), the performance of the structural system (K), and the dynamics of structures (C, a function of period T). Later, some additional coefficients related to ductility and elastic excursions were added to this equation.

        From last Five decades and more, the Applied Technological Council has spearheaded the development of a framework for the performance- based earthquake engineering practice under the funding of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Natural Science Foundation (NSF) and the department of defense (DOD). [Moehie J. P, 1992; Boquan LIU, 2004]. Three fundamental publications have laid the foundation for the development of performance-based earthquake engineering.

ATC-13(1985)

The report, funded by FEMA provided a methodology to estimate the probable repair costs for California buildings damaged by earthquakes. Based on the expert opinions of knowledgeable engineers and intended for application this has been used to estimate of Probable Maximum Loses (PML) of broad classes of buildings rather than individual structure [Freeman, 2004].

 

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures

Disclaimer: This document does not claim any originality and cannot be used as a substitute for prescribed textbooks. I would like to ac...